1. Leave granted.

1. In addition to the directions issued in paragraph 18(i) to (iv) of the judgment dated 29.07.2022, the following direction shall be read as direction No. 18 (v) of the said judgment:

1. On perusing the detailed and comprehensive suggestions submitted to us by the three Amici Curiae viz. Gaurav Agrawal, Liz Mathew and Mr. Devansh A. Mohta, Advocate, after discussion with Mr. K. M. Nataraj, ASG in respect of...

1. We are faced with a case of patricide albeit both the father and the son were drinking together.  

1. The challenge in Civil Appeal Nos. 7759-7760 of 2014 is to an order dated 7.3.2013 passed by the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Writ Petition No. 31893 of 2011 whereby the appellant herein i.e., Gulf Oil Corporation Limited1 was...

1. Heard Mr. Jayanth Nath, learned senior counsel for the appellant. Neither the counsel for the High Court nor that of the contesting respondents would want to make their submissions.

1. As all the three appeals are with respect to the same Assessee and with respect to the same period but with respect to the service tax liability and the penalty on such service tax liability, all the three appeals are decided...

1. In view of the aforesaid factual background, we do not find any good ground and reason to interfere with the final conclusion and decision of the High Court.

2. Facts in brief giving rise to the present appeals are as under:  

1. Leave granted.