1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 01.04.2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Appeal No. 645 of 2004 and Criminal Appeal No. 563 of 2004 by...
LATEST JUDGEMENTS
In Re: Perry Kansagra
2. After discussing the relevant facts and circumstances in aforesaid paragraphs 1 to 33, paragraphs 34 to 36 of the Order dated 7.10.2021 set out the essential features of the matter as under:—
Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Amritsar (Punjab) v. D.L. Steels etc.
1. These appeals raise a common question - should dried pomegranate seeds, domestically known as ‘anardana’, be classified under Heading 0813 of the Tariff entries issued under the Customs Tariff Act, 19751, as claimed by the...
Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Sunil Krishna Khaitan and Others
1. This common judgment would decide the aforesaid two appeals preferred by the Securities and Exchange Board of India1, whereby it has challenged the order of the Securities Appellate Tribunal2 dated 19th June 2013 in Appeal No...
Shishpal @ Shishu v. State of NCT of Delhi
These two appeals have been filed by A1 and A3 respectively to overturn the conviction sentencing them for life for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) by...
Commissioner of Sales Tax Odisha and Others v. Essel Mining and Industries Ltd. and Another
1. The Five Special Leave Petitions arising from the orders of the High Court of Orissa are taken up for hearing on pure questions of law.
Dinesh Bhabootmal Salecha v. Commissioner of Customs (Import)
1. The appeals will stand dismissed.
Talli Gram Panchayat v. Union of India and Others
1. These appeals arise from an order dated 16 July 2021 of the National Green Tribunal1. The appellant challenged the grant of an environmental clearance to Ultratech Cement Limited2 by a letter dated 5 January 2017. The NGT by...
Chief Executive Officer, Bhilai Steel Plant, Bhilai v. Mahesh Kumar Gonnade and Others
1. Heard Mr. Maninder Singh, the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant.
R.M. Sundaram @ Meenakshisundaram v. Sri Kayarohanasamy and Neelayadhakshi Amman Temple (Through Its Executive Officer) Nagapattinam, Tamil Nadu
1. The dispute in the present appeals arises from two separate suits in relation to (i) the dedication of 26 items of jewellery1, some of which are embedded with diamonds and precious stones, to the deity Sri Neelayadhakshi Amman...







