1. Application seeking listing of review petition in open Court is rejected.

1. It stands established on record that the Revenue failed to prove proper service of both the Show Cause Notice and the addendum on the Assessee, and a categorical finding returned to this effect by the Customs Excise and...

1. The appellant is the partnership firm stated to be inter alia engaged in business of construction of residential and commercial buildings. A contract was executed on 13.05.2010 between the parties for construction of 36 Unit...

1. The issue that falls for consideration is whether ‘emulsified bitumen’, which is stated to be a liquid form obtained from the process of heating the ‘bitumen’ at certain temperature, is different and distinct from ‘bitumen’...

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad passed in orders in Appeal Nos. 3085 to 3087 of 2007 by which the...

2. The facts leading to the present appeal in a nutshell are as under:-

1. Leave granted.

1. Since the facts and the question of law that arises for consideration in all the appeals are similar, all these appeals are being heard and disposed of by the present Judgment.

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated 29.10.2009 whereby the appeal filed by the appellant was dismissed, confirming the judgment of the Sessions Judge, Bathinda...

1. Leave granted.