1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.

1. This Appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) is against an interim order dated 18th August 2021 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench at New Delhi in...

1. This petition for review was listed for open Court hearing, since it was mentioned and submitted that this Court had overlooked the judgment of this Court in E.S. Krishnamurthy v. Bharath Hi-Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd. reported in...

1. This appeal is of the claimants, which arises out of the Impugned Judgment dated 05.04.2017 by the High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi Bench in an appeal against the order of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (for short, the...

1. The Miscellaneous Application for clarification/modification has been filed by Ms. Archana, a resident of Village Bhawariya, Tehsil Kukshi, District Dhar in the State of Madhya Pradesh.

2. In the enforcement proceedings being OMP (EFA) (Comm.) No. 6 of 2016 initiated by Daiichi, an apprehension was expressed that the Respondents were engaging in designs to move the assets outside the reach of Daiichi.

2. It will be apposite to take a narration of facts for better appreciation of the controversy raised in the instant appeals.

1. Leave granted.