1. Leave granted.

1. In Writ Petition (C) No. 740 of 1986, the preliminary issue is whether the view taken by a Constitution Bench of this Court in the case of Sardar Syedna Taher Saifuddin Saheb v. State of Bombay1, requires reconsideration.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 29.04.2016 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Principal Seat at Jabalpur in W.P. No. 3342/2015, by which, the High Court has allowed the...

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 30.05.2016 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Writ Petition (C) No. 1399 of 2014, by which, the High Court has allowed the said writ...

1. Leave granted.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 18.10.2019 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Regular First Appeal (RFA) No. 1100/2013 and other allied first...

1. The legal issue raised in the aforementioned writ petitions relates to the scope and ambit of judicial review in the matter of appointment of judges to the High Courts under Article 217 of the Constitution of India1.

1. Delay condoned.

1. We do not find any good ground and reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and hence, the special leave petition is dismissed.

1. Delay condoned.