1. The revenue is aggrieved by the impugned judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court which had quashed the initiation of search and seizure proceedings and all consequential proceedings, launched against the respondent/assessee.
LATEST JUDGEMENTS
State of Chattisgarh and Another v. Aman Kumar Singh and Others
1. Leave granted.
BLS Infrastructure Limited v. Rajwant Singh and Others
1. Leave granted.
Ravi Dhingra v. State of Haryana
1. Leave granted in Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 5296 of 2012. In all other cases, leave has already been granted.
Vikas Rathi v. State of U.P. and Another
1. The Order dated 16.05.2017 passed by the Allahabad High Court is under challenge before this Court. By the aforesaid order, Criminal Revision Petition was filed by the respondent No. 2 challenging the order dated 15.03.2017...
Commissioner of Central Excise, Allahabad v. J.R. Organics Ltd.
1. The revenue has filed this appeal, aggrieved by the order of Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi dated 27.07.2009. CESTAT had rendered its Order dated 12.11.2007 upon a...
Sarabjit Kaur v. State of Punjab and Another
1. The Appellant having failed before the High Court has filed the present appeal. A prayer was made for quashing of F.I.R. No. 430 dated 16.10.2017 under Sections 420, 120-B and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Shanti Prasad (D) Thr. Lrs v. Thakur Dass (D) Thr. Lrs and Others
1. Matter is called out.
State Bank of India and Others v. Shyam Sundar Adhikari
1. Leave granted.
Dharti Dredging and Infrastructure Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Guntur
2. Feeling aggrieved, the assessee appellant preferred an appeal to the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Guntur (hereinafter “the Appellate Commissioner”). The Appellate Commissioner, by an order dated 30.06.2008, after...