2. From the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court it appears that though in the counter affidavit filed before the High Court filed by the Land Acquisition Collector it was stated that the possession was taken on...

2. The facts leading to the present petition for Special Leave to Appeal in a nutshell are as under:—

1. These two appeals are directed against the final orders dated 29.04.2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench (hereinafter referred to as ‘High Court’) in two Miscellaneous Appeals (being S.B...

1. Leave granted.

1. Against the order passed by the Commissioner of Appeals, the petitioner has a remedy available to approach the ITAT.

1. These Criminal Appeals have been filed assailing the impugned judgment and order dated 13.06.2016 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Criminal Appeal Nos. 947 and 948 of 2009 by which the judgment of conviction...

1. By award dated 14.04.2000, the appellant, M/s. Nepa Limited, was held liable to pay Rs. 14,49,300/- to the respondent, Manoj Kumar Agrawal.

1. By the order dated 01.05.2009, notice in the special leave petition was confined to the first respondent - Gurbachan Singh.

1. These two appeals take exception to the judgment dated 31st July 2009 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh by which conviction of the appellants has been confirmed.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and orders dated 27.07.2010 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in ITA No. 556 of 2009 as well as the subsequent order dated 29.09.2010...