1. This appeal challenges the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity dated 13.11.2020.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 17-03-2021 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi, Principal Bench in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No...

1. Delay condoned.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 29.08.2007 passed by the Gauhati High Court by which the Division Bench of the High Court has dismissed the writ appeals preferred by the...

2. We have heard Shri Saif Zia, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants and Shri Siddhartha Dave, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the original complainant.

1. Pursuant to Article 342 of the Constitution of India, a list of Scheduled Tribes was notified by the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950 (for short ‘the ST Order’). By an Act of Parliament of 1976, the ST Order was...

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 24.09.2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Central Excise Appeal No. 186 of 2008 by which the Division Bench of the High Court...

1. Delay condoned.

1. Delay condoned.

2. By the impugned order, the Tribunal has directed the IRDA, in effect, to revisit the complaint made by the respondent no. 1 and pass a fresh order.