1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Writ Petition (C) No. 6478 of 2017 by which the High Court has allowed the said writ petition preferred...

2. In the present case, the notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was issued as far back as on 23.01.1965. Award was declared on 09.01.1981.

2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties at length and perused the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court.

1. Leave granted.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi dated 13.02.2017 in Writ Petition (C) No. 8685 of 2015 by which the High Court has allowed the said writ...

2. The facts leading to the present appeal in a nutshell are as under:—

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Writ Petition (C) No. 7004 of 2015 by which the High Court has allowed the said writ petition preferred...

1. Leave granted.

1. Having heard learned counsel for the respective parties and from the material on record, it appears that now it is the case on behalf of the Revenue that the respondent being the owner shall be entitled to depreciation.

1. No interference of this Court is called for in exercise of powers under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.