1. A suit for specific performance was decreed by the trial court, which was dismissed by the High Court in appeal, reversing the judgment and decree.

1. A suit for specific performance was decreed by the trial court, which was dismissed by the High Court in appeal, reversing the judgment and decree.

1. A suit for specific performance was decreed by the trial court, which was dismissed by the High Court in appeal, reversing the judgment and decree.

1. Heard learned counsel Mr. M. A. Chinnasamy for the appellant and learned counsel Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria for the respondent-State.

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.

1. This Criminal Appeal challenges the impugned judgment and order dated 11th December, 2009 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh whereby the conviction and sentence of the appellant has been affirmed. The appellant has...

1. Leave granted.

1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellants1 aggrieved by the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court2 in appeal3 filed by them. By the impugned judgment intra-court appeal filed by the Bank was dismissed...

1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellants1 aggrieved by the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court2 in appeal3 filed by them. By the impugned judgment intra-court appeal filed by the Bank was dismissed...