1. Delay condoned.

1. Delay condoned.

1. This Court is of the opinion that the impugned order does not call for interference.

2. The facts, in brief, giving rise to the present appeal are as under:  

1. When we heard this batch of Electricity appeals, it was agreed between all the parties that this Court should first decide Civil Appeal No. 684 of 2021 (Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited v. Adani Power...

1. The appellants challenge the judgment and order passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “APTEL”) dated 3rd November 2020, thereby dismissing the appeal filed by them and...

1. The present appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 21st December 2021 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (hereinafter referred to as ‘APTEL’), in Appeal No. 231 of 2021, filed by the appellants herein...

1. The present appeals challenge the judgment and order dated 28th September 2020 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (hereinafter referred to as ‘APTEL’), in cross appeals being Appeal No. 116 of 2019, filed by...

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned order dated 14-10-2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in ITA No. 933/2017, by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by the Revenue...

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 23.02.2010 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad passed in Tax Appeal No. 2186 of 2009, by which the High Court has allowed the said...