1. This case before us deals with the asymmetric federal model of governance in India, involving the contest of power between a Union Territory and the Union Government. The issue is who would have control over the “services” in...

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

1. Heard learned senior counsel/counsel for the parties.

1. By way of these proceedings, registered as Original Suit No. 1 of 2021, the State of Meghalaya seeks to invoke the original jurisdiction of this Court under Article 131 of the Constitution of India for a declaration that...

2. The other appeal, being Civil Appeal No. 1975 of 2023, is preferred by Assets and Care Reconstruction Ltd., a beneficiary of corporate guarantee, challenging the order dated 10.01.2023 whereby, the Appellate Tribunal directed...

1. Learned counsel appearing for the Revenue has stated at the Bar that the tax amount involved in the present Appeal is lower than the monetary limit fixed to prefer an Appeal before this Court. Therefore, he has requested to...

1. In exercise of powers under sub-clause (2) of Clause 6 of the Fifth Schedule to the Constitution of India, on 31st December 1977, the Hon'ble President of India declared the entire District of Sundargarh in the State of Orissa...

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, respondent no. 1 and respondent no. 2.

1. Delay condoned.

1. Leave granted.