1. A contract was entered into between the parties for the repair of bathrooms and other allied works on 02.07.2001. It would appear that time was extended up to 19.01.2002.

1. The present appeal was filed by three convicts namely Kamlesh Singh, Vishwaraj Singh and Munshi Singh. Vide order dated 17.05.2018, the appeal qua appellant Nos. 1 and 2 was dismissed and notice was issued only qua appellant...

1. Leave granted.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 15.03.2010 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi passed in ITA No. 439 of 2008, both, the Revenue as well as the assessees have preferred...

1. Delay condoned in SLP (C)Dy. No. 28020/2019.

1. The question which arises for consideration in these appeals, directed against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal1 (hereafter ‘CESTAT’ or ‘tribunal’) is whether the price at which the appellant...

1. The instant appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 19th April, 2007 passed by learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore upholding the order passed by the competent authority under...

1. Special leave granted in SLP (C) No. 12945/2018. In all these appeals, all respondents were served and had entered appearance.

1. Leave granted.

1. It is stated by Mr. V.P. Thangadurai learned counsel for the Respondent-assessee that the assessee has settled the dispute with the department under the VSV scheme and that the appeals have become infructutous.