1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment(s) and order(s) passed by the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack in Writ Petition Nos. 14922/2019, 10344/2021 and 20066/2019, by which, the Division Bench of the High...

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 24.09.2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Central Excise Appeal No. 186 of 2008 by which the Division Bench of the High Court...

1. By way of this writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner - convict in the State of Haryana has prayed for order or direction of quashing and setting aside the decision of the High...

1. Present application has been preferred by the Director General (Prisons), New Delhi seeking appropriate directions from this Court for surrender of prisoners/inmates who had been released on Emergency Parole or interim bail...

2. For the sake of convenience, the facts arising out of the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court in ITA No. 582/2009 are narrated, which in nutshell are as under

1. Permission to file the intervention application is granted.

1. Present reference to the larger Bench is made against the judgment and order in the case of Arup Bhuyan v. Union of India, (2011) 3 SCC 377 as well as State of Kerala v. Raneef, (2011) 1 SCC 784, pursuant to the order passed...

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has vehemently submitted that it was the specific case on behalf of the appellant before the High Court that as the original writ petitioners before the High Court were the...

2. By the impugned order, the Tribunal has directed the IRDA, in effect, to revisit the complaint made by the respondent no. 1 and pass a fresh order.

1. Delay condoned.