1. The appellant, a sole proprietorship firm, is aggrieved by the judgment impugned dated 26th August, 2010, passed by the High Court of Karnataka, Bangalore, whereby the appeal1 preferred by it against the order dated 29th...

1. These two appeals are filed by the accused No. 1 (“A-1”) (Kadira Jeevan) and accused No. 3 (“A-3”) (B.S. Dinesh) who are challenging the decision of the High Court dated 28.07.2009 in Criminal Appeal Nos. 1528 of 2006 and 1529...

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

1. A complaint under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘the Cr.P.C.’) was filed by the first respondent showing the appellant as an accused and alleging offences punishable under Sections 323, 342...

1. This petition seeking leave to appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution is at the instance of M/s. Universal Sompo General Insurance Company Limited, Original appellant before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal...

1. It is submitted by learned Panel Advocate appearing for the Revenue/Appellant(s) and Mr. Percy J. Pardiwala learned Senior counsel appearing for the Assessee/Respondent(s) that in these appeals the relied upon judgments were...

1. Leave granted.

1. The present appeal arises out of the judgment of the High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition No. 2657 of 2017, wherein it confirmed the award dated 30.03.2017 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal (hereinafter...

1. Though the dispute involved in these appeals concerns the return of the passport of the appellant, it is an outcome of a matrimonial dispute between the appellant and 4th respondent who is his wife.

1. Leave granted.