1. The petitioners by way of these petitions have challenged the common judgment and order dated 21.02.2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur, in S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 704 of 2018 and...

1. The issues raised in these petitions is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in Union of India v. Ganpati Dealcom Pvt. Ltd. (2022 SCC OnLine SC 1064).

1. Delay condoned.

1. Delay condoned.

1. This Court is of the opinion that the impugned order does not call for interference.

2. The facts, in brief, giving rise to the present appeal are as under:  

1. The appellants challenge the judgment and order passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “APTEL”) dated 3rd November 2020, thereby dismissing the appeal filed by them and...

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned order dated 14-10-2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in ITA No. 933/2017, by which the High Court has dismissed the said appeal preferred by the Revenue...

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 23.02.2010 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad passed in Tax Appeal No. 2186 of 2009, by which the High Court has allowed the said...

2. APML and MSEDCL had entered into four long term Power Project Agreements (hereinafter referred to as ‘PPA’) dated (a) 8th September, 2008 for 1230 MW (hereinafter referred to as ‘1230 MW PPA’); (b) 21st March, 2010 for 1200 MW...