1. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment. However, we would like to clarify that the petitioner will be entitled to raise all pleas and contentions...

1. These appeals are at the instance of the original first informant (brother of the deceased) and are directed against a common order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 322 of 2021 and...

2. The facts leading to the present appeals in nutshell are as under:

2. The facts leading to the present appeal in nutshell are as under:

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 27.10.2016 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in CWP No. 26213/2014 and other allied writ petitions, by which, the...

1. The order dated 22.08.2017 passed by the High Court of Delhi in Writ Petition (C) No. 5339/2016 has been impugned before this Court.

1. The impugned order set asides the assessment for AY 2014-2015 on the ground that the jurisdictional officer had not adjudicated upon the returns.

1. We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court. The special leave petition(s) stand(s) dismissed accordingly.

1. This transfer petition has been filed by the petitioner-wife for transfer of the proceedings in Petition No 308 of 2017 titled “Rajendra Singh Somvanshi @ Tinku v. Nitu Devi Somvanshi” from the Court of Judge, Family Court...

1. Admit.