1. This appeal1, is preferred by Infrastructure Leasing and Financial Services Ltd (hereafter “IL&FS” or “the borrower”) aggrieved by an order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (hereafter, ‘NCLAT’)2.

1. The writ-petitioner organisation, approaches this court under Article 32 of the Constitution, seeking issuance of appropriate orders directing the respondents [Union government, and each State/UT government - collectively...

1. I had the benefit of reading the scholarly judgment of my learned Brother, Hrishikesh Roy, J., dismissing this appeal filed against the judgment and order of the High Court1 dated 12.01.2010 passed in S.B. Civil Regular Second...

1. In a pending prosecution for the offences punishable under Sections 148, 341, 323, 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, by order dated 08th June 2022, the learned Additional Sessions Judge exercised power...

1. Pursuant to our order and direction dated 09.10.2023, the Office of the District Medical & Health Officer (Chairperson District Medical Board), Medchal-Malkajgiri-District has submitted its report dated 11.10.2023 after...

1. The appellant before us has described himself as the managing director of the Respondent No. 2, Totem Infrastructures Limited (corporate debtor) against whom proceedings have been initiated on account of default in repaying...

1. This appeal impugns a judgment and order of conviction passed by the High Court of Delhi in Criminal Appeal No. 431 of 2009 dated 31 May 2010, confirming the Appellant-Abhishek Sharma's sentence of life imprisonment under...

1. Respondent is stated to have been inducted as a tenant in respect of shop No. AC 249, Rabindrapally, Krishnapur, Post Office Prafulla Kanan, Police Station Baguiati, Kolkata - 700101, District 24 Parganas (North) at an agreed...

1. The Transfer Petitions in these proceedings are allowed.

1. The present appeal is directed against the order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1 dated 03.08.2010 whereby the complaint filed by the appellant and proforma respondent No. 3 under Section...