1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

1. Challenge in the present appeal is to the order in a Writ Appeal1 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court2 by which the judgment of the learned Single Judge passed in W.P. No. 36424 of 2005, was set aside.

1. Both the above appeals arise out of the judgment and order dated 08.08.2007 passed by the Rajasthan High Court in Criminal Appeal No. 976 of 2002, whereby all the accused who stood convicted by the Trial Court for the offences...

1. We are not inclined to proceed further with the present writ petition, as it is clear from the counter affidavit filed by respondent no. 2 - Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) that the cellular mobile telephone...

1. This appeal before us shows how the execution proceedings under Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPC’), are being delayed, and the process is being abused in the execution...

1. ‘Is a second petition maintainable under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on grounds that were available for challenge even at the time of filing of the first petition thereunder?’

1. The appellant before this Court has been convicted under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’) and has been sentenced for seven years of R.I. and Rs. 1000/- as fine, with default stipulations...

1. Leave granted.

1. The order of this Court of 26 September 2023 sets out the background. Rather than replicate the background, we set it out below :

1. Leave granted.