1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

1. Shah Originals/assessee is the appellant in the subject Civil Appeals. The Commissioner of Income Tax-24, Mumbai/Revenue, is the respondent. The appeals arise from the orders dated 22.04.2010 in Income Tax Appeal Nos 431 and...

1. Moturu Nalini Kanth, then a minor, claimed absolute right and title over the properties of late Venkubayamma under registered Will Deed dated 03.05.1982. It was also claimed that he was adopted by her, as evidenced by...

1. Leave granted.

1. These appeals arise from a claim made by the first respondent, Mr. Mukul Aggarwal (the owner), on account of damage caused to his BMW 3 Series 320D car (the car). The damage was caused due to an accident which took place near...

1. The appellants before this Court have challenged the Judgment dated 20.09.2021 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh (in Civil Appeal Nos. 6233-6234 of 2023, Vivek Kaisth and Akansha Dogra...

1. The Civil Appeal arises from the Judgment dated 24.08.2022 in L.P.A. No. 165 of 2022 in the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi. The State of Jharkhand and the Director of Mines and Geology, Ranchi/Respondents in the L.P.A are...

1. This civil appeal arises from the judgment and decree dated 29th November, 2010 rendered by the Karnataka High Court, whereby an appeal under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”, hereafter) was allowed...

1. Leave granted.