1. The judgment passed by the High Court1 in an appeal2 filed by the respondents is challenged before this Court. The appellants are the claimants who filed application before the Commissioner3 seeking compensation under the...

1. The appellants stood charged and convicted under Sections 302 and 120B, while being acquitted under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 279 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’) by the Additional Sessions Judge-II, Beed in...

1. Heard Mr. J.P. Cama, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant. Also heard Mr. Abhishek Vikas, the learned counsel for the respondents.

1. The appellant/accused - S K Khaja has preferred the present appeal challenging the impugned judgment and order dated 07.01.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad in Criminal Appeal No. 162...

1. The Appeals arise from the Judgment dated 24.01.2018 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 9988 of 2006 on the file of High Court of Orissa, Cuttack.

1. This appeal arises out of the judgement of the High Court of Judicature at Calcutta, dated 16.12.2010, passed in ‘WPST No. 600 of 2010’ filed by respondent Mitul Kumar Jana.

1. The Respondent no. 1- Market Committee had preferred two First Appeals being Nos. 1447 of 2006 and 1490 of 2006 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, challenging the award dated 07.03.2006 passed by the II Adhoc...

1. These appeals challenge a common judgment of the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court1.

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the respondent.

1. The writ petition1 was filed by the appellant in the Gauhati High Court in the year 2008 praying for release of her salary from 12.03.2001 onwards.