1. Being aggrieved by the order of remand passed by the Kerala High Court in ITA Nos. 1508, 1757 and 1760 of 2009 by judgment dated 23.03.2010, the assessee(s) has filed these appeals.

1. Leave granted in those Special Leave Petitions where it has not yet been granted.

1. The appellant, who is the original plaintiff has preferred this appeal for challenging the impugned judgment and order dated 23rd June 2021 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay...

1. This appeal is at the instance of four convicts and is directed against the judgment and order dated 23rd July, 2019 passed by the High Court at Calcutta in Criminal Appeal No. 26 of 2018, by which the High Court dismissed the...

1. The occurrence based on which the appellant was convicted was of 7th November 2003. According to the prosecution case, around 10 a.m. on that day, about 1,000 to 1,500 people had gathered in the Shah Alam area of the city of...

1. Delay condoned.

1. The appellant before us, after being acquitted by the Trial Court, on appeal by the State, was convicted by the High Court for commission of offences under Sections 302 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

1. These appeals would call in question the legality and validity of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 24.08.2022 and 05.09.2022 passed by the High Court of Sikkim at Gangtok in Criminal Appeal No. 08 of 2020...

1. This reference before the Constitution Bench arises in pursuance of an order dated 8 March 2022 of a Bench of three-Judges. The three-Judge Bench was in turn hearing a reference by two-Judges which was made on 3 May 2018.

1. This batch of cases raises two significant issues: