1. Leave granted.
LATEST JUDGEMENTS
P. Sarangapani (Dead), through LR Paka Saroja v. State of Andhra Pradesh
1. The original appellant P. Sarangapani son of Laxmaiah (accused no. 1) having expired pending the present Appeal, his wife Paka Saroja was permitted to proceed further with the Appeal as per the order passed by the court on...
Rajesh and Another v. State of Madhya Pradesh
1. Ajit Pal @ Bobby, a 15-year-old lad, was killed brutally in the last week of July, 2013. A neighbour, Om Prakash Yadav, along with his brother, Raja Yadav, and son, Rajesh @ Rakesh Yadav, stood trial in Sessions Case No. 560...
South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others
1. This batch of appeals arises from a judgment dated 21 July 2010 by a Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in a set of petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Joseph v. State of Kerala and Others
1. The petitioner, currently serving a life imprisonment sentence for a crime committed in 1996, punishable under Sections 302 and 392 of the Indian Penal Code (hereafter “IPC”) approaches this court seeking to enforce his right...
Sunil v. State of NCT of Delhi
1. These three appeals are against the judgment and order of the High Court of Delhi (in short “the High Court”) dated 28.07.2009 passed in Criminal Appeal Nos. 962 of 2004; 977 of 2004; 981 of 2004; 14 of 2005; and 61 of 2005...
Suresh Lataruji Ramteke v. Sau. Sumanbai Pandurang Petkar and Others
1. Leave granted.
Texonic Instruments v. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Another
1. Leave granted in the listed special leave petitions.
Batliboi Environmental Engineers Limited v. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited and Another
1. This appeal by way of special leave by Batliboi Environmental Engineers Limited1 takes exception to the judgment dated 02.11.2007, whereby the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed the appeal2 filed...
Celir LLP v. Bafna Motors (Mumbai) Pvt. Ltd. and Others
1. Since the issues raised in both the captioned appeals are same, the parties are also the same and the challenge is also to the self-same judgment and order passed by the High Court those were taken up for hearing analogously...







