1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:—

1. This appeal by special leave takes exception to the conviction of the appellant under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).

1. These appeals have been filed by the legal representatives of the opposite party-sole proprietor against the common final judgment and order dated 02.05.2018 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission...

1. These appeals take exception to the final impugned judgment dated 10th November, 2022 passed by the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad rejecting the Criminal Appeal No. 594 of 2011 preferred by the appellants...

1. Civil Suit No. 22A/80 was dismissed by the learned Additional Civil Judge, Class-1, Mudwara Katni, vide judgment dated 21.12.1992.

1. By the order dated 1st December 2023, a Bench of three Hon'ble Judges of this Court expressed a view that a decision of this Court in the case of Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Private Limited v. Central Bureau of...

1. Vide impugned order1 passed by the High Court2, an application filed by respondents No. 1 and 2/plaintiffs for amendment of the plaint was allowed subject to costs of Rs. 2,000/-.

1. The Special Leave Petitions arise from a judgment dated 18 August 2020 of a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in a batch of ten petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

1. This common judgment decides the aforestated appeals preferred by the Revenue and the assessees, who are cellular mobile telephone service providers.

1. The petitioner who is a practising advocate has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India raising an important issue regarding failure of the concerned agencies to address the...