1. Leave Granted.

1. This appeal, at the instance of certain affected landowners, challenges an order dated 21st December 2011 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Delhi (“High Court”, hereafter).

1. The petitioner invokes the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the better functioning of the State Information Commissions1 under the Right to Information Act, 2005.2

1. Delay condoned.

1. Rule Nisi.

1. These writ petitions raise questions involving the interpretation of the Office Memoranda [OM] dated 19.01.2019 and 31.01.2019 prescribing the eligibility for the Economically Weaker Section [EWS] Category.

1. The issue that falls for consideration in this case revolves around the true construction, meaning and import of the expression ‘vacant land’ contained in Section 2(q) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (in...

1. The point that arises for our consideration is whether “tinted glass sheets” manufactured by the appellants is liable to be taxed as “goods or wares made of glass” under the Notification No. 5784 dated 07.09.1981 being Entry...

1. The proceedings initiated under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’) against the respondent herein came to be questioned by him by filing an application for discharge on the ground of...

1. On the last date of hearing, i.e. 15 September 2023, notice was issued to the Registrars General of all the High Courts, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal,1 the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission,2 and...