1. The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai has preferred this appeal against the final judgment and order dated 24.04.2009 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court allowing writ appeal no. 1487 of 2008 filed by...

1. With consent, heard the counsel for parties.

1. Delay condoned on 23.08.2023.

1. The writ-petitioner organisation, approaches this court under Article 32 of the Constitution, seeking issuance of appropriate orders directing the respondents [Union government, and each State/UT government - collectively...

1. This appeal1, is preferred by Infrastructure Leasing and Financial Services Ltd (hereafter “IL&FS” or “the borrower”) aggrieved by an order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (hereafter, ‘NCLAT’)2.

1. I had the benefit of reading the scholarly judgment of my learned Brother, Hrishikesh Roy, J., dismissing this appeal filed against the judgment and order of the High Court1 dated 12.01.2010 passed in S.B. Civil Regular Second...

1. The present batch of appeals arise from decisions of the Delhi High Court involving interpretation of the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) clause contained in various Indian treaties with countries that are members of the...

1. Leave granted.

1. Chennai Metro Rail Limited, the applicant (hereinafter referred to as “Chennai Metro”), a joint venture between the Central Government and the Government of Tamil Nadu, had, pursuant to a public tender, awarded the contract to...

1. In a pending prosecution for the offences punishable under Sections 148, 341, 323, 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, by order dated 08th June 2022, the learned Additional Sessions Judge exercised power...