1. The present appeals arise out of impugned common judgment and final order dated 08.06.2021 passed by Division Bench of High Court of Judicature at Bombay in three Writ Petitions.
LATEST JUDGEMENTS
Yogesh @ Sonu Tharu v. State
1. Criminal Appeal No. 872/2022 is filed by accused No. 1 Pradeep Dabas while Criminal Appeal No. 871/2022 has been filed by accused No. 2 Yogesh @ Sonu Tharu. In both these appeals, the appellants have challenged the judgment of...
Krishnadatt Awasthy v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others
1. After perusal of the judgment and view expressed by esteemed brother Justice K.V. Viswanathan, in the facts of this case, I am not in a position to agree with the reasoning and conclusions as drawn by him, for which detailed...
Sant Bhagwan Baba Shikshan Mandal and Others v. Gunwant and Others
1. The appellants are aggrieved by the judgment dated 17th November, 2009, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, whereunder a Writ Petition1 filed by the respondent no. 1 praying inter alia for being...
State of Karnataka by Gandhinagar P.S. v. M.N. Basavaraja and Others
1. The first respondent along with the other respondents (second to fifth) stood trial before the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-II at Davangere, Karnataka for commission of offence punishable under...
Union of India and Another v. Jahangir Byramji Jeejeebhoy(D) Through His Lr
1. Leave granted.
Samaj Parivartana Samudaya and Others v. State of Karnataka and Others
1. To avoid prolixity and repetition, we refrain from restating the facts and developments in the present writ petitions, as they have already been delineated in our prior order dated 14.03.2024.
Ballu and Another v. State of Madhya Pradesh
1. The present appeal challenges the judgment dated 6th April 2018 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Criminal Appeal No. 261 of 1995, thereby allowing the appeal of the respondent-State which was filed...
Bharti Airtel Limited v. A.S. Raghavendra
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent-in-person.
S V Cheriyakoya Thangal v. S.V P Pookoya and Others
1. Leave granted.







