1. The autonomy and independence of administrative bodies are fundamental to their ability to perform their designated functions effectively.

1. These Civil Appeals call in question the correctness of the judgment dated 17.06.2013 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur in First Appeal No. 1210 of 2008 (filed by the appellant herein) and First...

1. The appellant, the accused no. 1, who has been convicted for the offences punishable under Section 294(b) and 302 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, ‘the IPC’), has preferred this appeal. There were six accused.

1. Both the above appeals assail the correctness of the judgment and order dated 29.03.2017 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh whereby the RSA No. 392 of 2005 titled Vikram Singh v. Tota Ram (since deceased) through LRs...

1. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in Civil Appeal have filed O.S. No. 13/2000 before the Court of Principal District Judge at Vishakhapatnam. The suit is for partition and possession of plaint schedule property. The prayer reads thus:

1. Though factually different, these appeals involve common question of law - whether the purchase of a vehicle/good by a Company for the use/personal use of its directors would amount to purchase for “commercial purpose” within...

1. This appeal is at the instance of the original third, second, and fourth defendants. The first and second respondents are the original plaintiffs. The third respondent is the mother of the deceased original first defendant...

1. Leave granted.

1. Thankamma George/Appellant, and Lilly Thomas/Respondent No. 1, are sisters, and the daughters of one late George. P.M. Thomas/Respondent No. 2 is the husband of Respondent No. 1.

1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.