1. These appeals have been filed by the legal representatives of the opposite party-sole proprietor against the common final judgment and order dated 02.05.2018 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission...

1. Leave granted.

1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:—

1. This appeal takes an exception to the judgment of the High Court in the second appeal preferred by the appellants. Appellant no. 1 was the first plaintiff, and appellant no. 1(ii), (iii) and (iv), as well as appellant no. 2...

1. These appeals take exception to the final impugned judgment dated 10th November, 2022 passed by the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad rejecting the Criminal Appeal No. 594 of 2011 preferred by the appellants...

1. The Special Leave Petitions arise from a judgment dated 18 August 2020 of a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in a batch of ten petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

1. Vide impugned order1 passed by the High Court2, an application filed by respondents No. 1 and 2/plaintiffs for amendment of the plaint was allowed subject to costs of Rs. 2,000/-.

1. Civil Suit No. 22A/80 was dismissed by the learned Additional Civil Judge, Class-1, Mudwara Katni, vide judgment dated 21.12.1992.

1. By the order dated 1st December 2023, a Bench of three Hon'ble Judges of this Court expressed a view that a decision of this Court in the case of Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Private Limited v. Central Bureau of...

1. This common judgment decides the aforestated appeals preferred by the Revenue and the assessees, who are cellular mobile telephone service providers.