1. The appellant is accused no. 2. Along with other co-accused, he was prosecuted for the offences punishable under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, ‘the NDPS Act’).

1. Heard Mr. Rana Mukherjee, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner. The respondents - High Court of Manipur and the Registrar General are represented by Mr. Vijay Hansaria, learned Senior Counsel.

1. The appellants are aggrieved by an order dated 21.07.2010 passed by the High Court1 in Writ Petition2 filed against the order dated 18.07.20033 passed by the Tribunal4.

1. The instant appeal arises out of the impugned judgment and order dated 04.07.2019, passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Seat at Jabalpur in Criminal Appeal No. 1867 of 2007, whereby the High Court has...

1. Heard.

1. Leave granted.

1. Both the appeals having common question of law and facts were heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.

1. The appellant-State of Uttar Pradesh has assailed the Judgment and Order dated 18th April, 2022 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in an intra court appeal1 directed against the common...

1. The appellants - original plaintiffs have assailed the Judgment and Decree passed by the High Court of Gauhati in Regular Second Appeal No. 74/2006, whereby the High Court had allowed the appeal preferred by the respondents ...

1. Leave granted.