1. Heard.

1. The appellants are aggrieved by an order dated 21.07.2010 passed by the High Court1 in Writ Petition2 filed against the order dated 18.07.20033 passed by the Tribunal4.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

1. Leave granted.

1. The instant appeal arises out of the impugned judgment and order dated 04.07.2019, passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Seat at Jabalpur in Criminal Appeal No. 1867 of 2007, whereby the High Court has...

1. The present Writ Petition, under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, has been filed by the petitioner-Girish Gandhi seeking an appropriate Writ or Direction to the effect that the personal bonds and sureties executed by...

1. Heard Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the appellant - Union of India. Also heard Mr. Ankur Mahindro, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

1. This appeal arises from an order dated 22.07.2016 in Consumer Complaint No. 280 of 2015 (hereinafter the “Impugned Order”), wherein the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as the “NCDRC”)...

1. Heard Mr. Rana Mukherjee, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner. The respondents - High Court of Manipur and the Registrar General are represented by Mr. Vijay Hansaria, learned Senior Counsel.

1. The appellants - original plaintiffs have assailed the Judgment and Decree passed by the High Court of Gauhati in Regular Second Appeal No. 74/2006, whereby the High Court had allowed the appeal preferred by the respondents ...