1. Vide judgment and order dated 3rd May, 1999, learned Sessions Judge, Bhiwani convicted the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’) and by an...

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.  

1. The petitioner and the first respondent married in the Netherlands under Dutch Law on 5 July 2013. They have a five year old child who was born on 14 December 2018. The first respondent and the child are citizens of the...

1. We have heard Ms Pooja Dhar, counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants and Mr R Balasubramanian, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.

1. Leave granted.

1. The appellants, who are father and son, were prosecuted for the offence punishable under Section 302, read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The incident occurred on 17th September 1996.

1. This appeal is directed against the final order dated 23rd January, 2023 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter being referred to as ‘Commission’) whereby, the learned Commission, while...

1. The dispute in the above two appeals is in connection with easementary rights over 20ft. wide road situated over land Survey No. 57 Hissa No. 13A/1 which is presently owned by the respondents herein (hereinafter the...

1. The curative jurisdiction of this Court under Article 142 of the Constitution has been invoked in regard to its decision in Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd.1. The judgment...