1. This Court, vide order dated 22nd August, 2025, after considering the submissions made on behalf of the parties and the material placed on record, had supplemented, modified, and clarified the earlier directions issued vide...

2. The present special leave petitions1 have been preferred against the impugned judgment and final order dated 17th May, 2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad2 in Writ-C No. 22576 of 2016. Vide the said order...

1. Heard.

1. Leave granted.

1. These Appeals being Criminal Appeal No. 2195 of 2025, Criminal Appeal No. 2189 of 2025 and Criminal Appeal No. 2190 of 2025 were originally filed as Special Leave Petitions where leave was granted vide Order dated 22.04.2025.

1. These appeals arise from the judgments and orders passed by the High Court of Delhi dated 11.05.2015 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1497 of 2012 and 01.06.2017 in Review Petition No. 217/2017 in W.P.(C) No. 1497/2012...

1. Application seeking permission to appear and argue in-person is allowed.

1. The petitioner suffered a conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. She, however, failed to disclose her conviction in the nomination form for the election to the post of Councillor.

1. The present civil appeal arises from the final judgment and decree dated 30 August 2005 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in Regular First Appeal No. 750 of 1994 (hereinafter, “impugned judgment”), whereby the...

2. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 28th June 2024, passed in MACA No. 210 and 1219 of 2015; and Judgment and order dated 27.11.24 in R.P. Nos. 1165 and 1187 of 2024 by the High Court of Kerala at...