1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:—

1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:

1. The appellant herein has challenged the judgment and order dated 04.12.2009 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Gujarat in Criminal Appeal No. 137 of 2000.

1. This Appeal calls in question the impugned judgment dated 10.05.2017 passed by High Court of Madras at Madurai in Writ Appeal (MD) No. 521 of 2017, whereby the High Court directed the appellant to appear before the Dean...

1. Leave granted.

1. When the Transfer Petition (Criminal) No. 613 of 2025 was listed before us, upon perusal of the pleadings, we noticed that scurrilous and scandalous allegations had been made against a sitting Judge of the High Court of...

1. Leave granted.

1. This Court, vide order dated 22nd August, 2025, after considering the submissions made on behalf of the parties and the material placed on record, had supplemented, modified, and clarified the earlier directions issued vide...

1. Leave granted.

2. The present special leave petitions1 have been preferred against the impugned judgment and final order dated 17th May, 2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad2 in Writ-C No. 22576 of 2016. Vide the said order...