1. Both the above appeals assail the correctness of the judgment and order dated 29.03.2017 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh whereby the RSA No. 392 of 2005 titled Vikram Singh v. Tota Ram (since deceased) through LRs...

1. The autonomy and independence of administrative bodies are fundamental to their ability to perform their designated functions effectively.

1. Leave granted.

1. The appellant, the accused no. 1, who has been convicted for the offences punishable under Section 294(b) and 302 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, ‘the IPC’), has preferred this appeal. There were six accused.

1. Delay condoned.

1. The appeals arise from an order dated 22 March 2012 of the High Court of Telangana by which a criminal proceeding arising out of FIR No 336 of 2009 registered at Central Crime Station, Hyderabad has been quashed.  

1. Thankamma George/Appellant, and Lilly Thomas/Respondent No. 1, are sisters, and the daughters of one late George. P.M. Thomas/Respondent No. 2 is the husband of Respondent No. 1.

1. Leave granted.

1. Though factually different, these appeals involve common question of law - whether the purchase of a vehicle/good by a Company for the use/personal use of its directors would amount to purchase for “commercial purpose” within...

1. The petitioner, an entity incorporated in the United Arab Emirates, was purportedly approached by the respondents to finance a telecommunication project undertaken by Telesuprecon Nigeria Limited (TNL).