1. The only argument advanced by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner is that the respondents do not fall in the Doubtful-III (D-III) Category as five years have not been completed from the date of declaration of NPA.
LATEST JUDGEMENTS
Jitendra Nath Mishra v. State of U.P. and Another
1. This appeal, by special leave, takes exception to an order dated 1st June, 2022 of the Allahabad High Court.
Ghanshyam v. Yogendra Rathi
1. Heard Shri Rajul Shrivastav, learned counsel for the defendant-appellant.
Arun Agarwal v. Ram Ratan Kanoongo and Another
1. By an order dated 18 April, 2023, the National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad appointed the Respondent No. 2 as the Liquidator of the subject company.
Ramesh Chandra Vaishya v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another
1. Leave granted.
Central GST Delhi – III v. Delhi International Airport Ltd.
1. In all these appeals, orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal1 (hereafter “CESTAT”) are impugned by the service tax authorities (hereafter “the revenue”), who argue that user development fee levied and...
Prakash Nishad @ Kewat Zinak Nishad v. State of Maharashtra
1. Leave granted.
Government of Andhra Pradesh and Others v. M. Rama Rao and Others
1. Leave granted.
Om Prakash Banerjee v. State of West Bengal and Others
1. Leave granted.
All India Judges Association v. Union of India and Others
1. The District Judiciary1 is the backbone of the judicial system.