1. Leave granted.

1. The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad1 has held the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 20042 to be unconstitutional on the ground that it violates the principle of secularism and Articles 14 and 21A of the...

1. This Appeal is preferred against the judgment and order dated 18.10.1996 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam (hereinafter referred to as “the impugned judgment”), upholding the order of conviction and sentence...

1. The present appeal arises from the judgment dated 30.06.2014 of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (for short the “APTEL”) in Appeal No. 29 of 2013. By the said judgement, the APTEL dismissed the appeal of the appellant...

1. In the present Appeals challenge is to the Judgment dated 14.02.2022 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “NCLAT”) which were preferred by the Appellant...

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.

1. The final judgment and order dated 13th October, 20111 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh2, allowing the writ appeal3 presented by the first respondent, is under assail in the present appeal by special leave.

1. The final judgment and order dated 13th October, 20111 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh2, allowing the writ appeal3 presented by the first respondent, is under assail in the present appeal by special leave.