1. Leave granted.

1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:—

1. Leave granted.

1. The present appeals challenge the Order on Charge dated 24th December, 2021 and Order framing Charges dated 03rd March, 2022 passed by the learned Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act1) Central Bureau of Investigation2...

1. This appeal arises from the order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 03.04.2024 in Application No. 15453 of 2023 filed by the appellant herein by which, the High Court rejected the same and thereby...

1. This is a statutory appeal under Section 67 of the Consumer Protection Act, 20191.

1. The appellant is accused no. 2. Along with other co-accused, he was prosecuted for the offences punishable under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, ‘the NDPS Act’).

1. Heard Mr. Rana Mukherjee, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner. The respondents - High Court of Manipur and the Registrar General are represented by Mr. Vijay Hansaria, learned Senior Counsel.

1. The instant appeal arises out of the impugned judgment and order dated 04.07.2019, passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Principal Seat at Jabalpur in Criminal Appeal No. 1867 of 2007, whereby the High Court has...

1. This appeal arises from an order dated 22.07.2016 in Consumer Complaint No. 280 of 2015 (hereinafter the “Impugned Order”), wherein the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as the “NCDRC”)...