1. In the present batch of appeals, this Court has to decide the contours defining the independence and impartiality of arbitral tribunals under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996.1

1. The petitioner which is a company duly incorporated under the laws of the United States of America1 has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under sub-sections (6) and (12) of Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

1. Article 30 of the Constitution of India guarantees to religious and linguistic minorities, the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice. The issues which arise for adjudication in this...

1. The petitioner has instituted proceedings under Article 137 of the Constitution read with Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules 2013 seeking a review of the judgment of a three-Judge Bench of this Court dated 25 August...

1. This judgment arises from a Writ Petition instituted in 2005 seeking directions to ensure meaningful access to public spaces for persons with disabilities1.

1. These two appeals are against common judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Madras1 dated 19.11.2019 passed in First Appeal No. 328 of 2005 and Cross Objection No. 10 of 2012 preferred against a final decree...

1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:

1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:—

1. For convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:—

1. Since the captioned petitions raise analogous issues between the same parties, those were taken up together and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.