1. Delay condoned.

1. The present appeal was initially filed by the appellant-Bibi Sidhika, the mother of the accused Mohd. Firoz, challenging the legality and validity of the impugned common judgement and order dated 15.07.2014 passed by the High...

1. This is yet another case where contrary to the vision of the founding fathers, non-adherence to the principles governing the exercise of power by the first appellate Court has driven the parties to the highest Court. The...

1. These appeals by special leave filed by original accused Nos. 1 to 4 are directed against the common judgment and order dated 04th September 2017 passed by the High Court1 in Criminal Reference Case No. 14 of 2010; and in...

2. Feeling aggrieved with the order passed by the Uttarakhand Public Service Tribunal, Dehradun (for short “Tribunal”) in Claim Petition No. 104/DB/2009, by which the Tribunal directed the Department to ignore the un-communicated...

2. Considering the fact that both the show cause notices - one dated 01.03.2016 issued by the Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence, Delhi Zonal Unit and the subsequent show cause notice dated 23.10.2017 issued by...

1. Leave granted.

1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment and decree in Regular Second Appeal No. 372 of 2003 dated 03.10.2008, whereby the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore has dismissed the appeal.  

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave Granted.