1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:—

1. All the three appellants, father, son and son-in-law are accused in Session Trial No. 215 of 2000 for the murder of Pushpendra Singh, son of Diler Singh.

1. Leave granted.

1. Leave granted.

1. All the three appellants, father, son and son-in-law are accused in Session Trial No. 215 of 2000 for the murder of Pushpendra Singh, son of Diler Singh.

1. Leave granted.

1. Dr. S. Rajaseekaran, a leading orthopaedic surgeon and a public-spirited citizen of this country has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India praying for the following reliefs in...

1. One Mahadevappa, son of Waderahalli Basappa of Village Shamanur was the owner of sites measuring 42 ft. × 30 ft. and 41 ½ ft. × 30 ft., which were carved out of Survey Nos. 113/2 and 114/1. These revenue sites were described...

1. Nilesh Baburao Gitte (the appellant) stands convicted for matricide-killing of one's own mother. By the present appeal, the appellant calls in question the correctness of the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay...

1. Leave granted.