1. In these two appeals, we are dealing only with accused no. 5-Balla @ Farhat, accused No. 6-Habib and accused No. 7-Imran.

1. We have gone through the order of the Settlement Commissioner dated 09.05.2007, who has recorded that the necessary duty was paid but in exercise of his power he decided to waive the interest component.

1. We have gone through the order of the Settlement Commissioner dated 09.05.2007, who has recorded that the necessary duty was paid but in exercise of his power he decided to waive the interest component.

1. Special leave granted.

1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

1. This appeal assails a judgement and order passed by the High Court of Kerala dated 5th August, 2009 in Second Appeal No. 740 of 1995 by which the findings returned in the First Appeal dated 3rd April, 1995, by the District...

1. In the present appeal, order dated 02.09.2010, passed by the High Court of Kerala in CRP No. 285 of 2008 has been challenged.

1. The present appeal is directed against the order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter for short “NCDRC”) dated 15.05.2015 dismissing the consumer complaint filed by the appellant herein.

1. Learned panel advocate appearing for the appellant-Revenue as well as learned counsel for the respondent(s) jointly submitted that the relied upon judgment in the order passed by the High Court namely Commissioner of Income...

1. This Civil Appeal has been filed assailing the judgment of the High Court of Gujarat dated 23.08.2016 passed in SCA No. 14239/2015, whereby the High Court has allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent (Principal...