1. Both the appeals arise out of the common Judgment and Order dated 16.03.2011 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in the Criminal Appeal No. 97 of 2000 preferred by the appellant-Parveen Kumar and the...

1. Both the appeals arise out of the common Judgment and Order dated 16.03.2011 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in the Criminal Appeal No. 97 of 2000 preferred by the appellant-Parveen Kumar and the...

1. These two appeals are directed against a common judgment and order of the High Court1 dated 1 September 2021 passed in OSA (CAD) Nos. 174-175 of 2021, whereby, exercising powers under Section 37 of the Arbitration and...

1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided in the following parts:

1. The respondent no. 1-accused no. 5 (referred hereinafter as “the respondent”), along with five other accused, was sought to be prosecuted for the offences punishable under Section 120 B of the Indian Penal Code (for short...

1. Delay condoned.

1. The appellants (the defendants in the suit), are here in challenge to the judgement dated 08.12.2022 whereby their Appeal was dismissed by the Division Bench of Calcutta High Court, upholding the judgment of the learned Single...

1. This appeal is against the judgment and order of the High Court1 dated 26.04.2012, whereby, while affirming the conviction of the appellants under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC2, the appeal3 of the appellants was partly allowed...

1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:—

1. Heard.