1. Leave granted.

1. Delay, if any, is condoned.

1. Delay condoned. Leave granted.

1. Both the above appeals assail the correctness of the judgment and order dated 29.03.2017 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh whereby the RSA No. 392 of 2005 titled Vikram Singh v. Tota Ram (since deceased) through LRs...

1. The appellant who is the original defendant before the trial Court has preferred this appeal questioning the correctness and legality of the judgment dated 07.06.2011 whereunder the second appeal filed by him in S.A No. 1282...

1. These appeals are preferred by New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) against the main judgment dated 05.01.2017 rendered in Writ C. No. 36231/2015 (in Civil Appeal No. 8048 of 2019, titled NOIDA v. Darshan lal...

1. The autonomy and independence of administrative bodies are fundamental to their ability to perform their designated functions effectively.

1. Leave granted.

1. The appellant, the accused no. 1, who has been convicted for the offences punishable under Section 294(b) and 302 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, ‘the IPC’), has preferred this appeal. There were six accused.

1. Leave granted.