1. This is an appeal by accused no. 2 who has been convicted by the High Court for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, ‘IPC’).

1. Rule Nisi.

1. These writ petitions raise questions involving the interpretation of the Office Memoranda [OM] dated 19.01.2019 and 31.01.2019 prescribing the eligibility for the Economically Weaker Section [EWS] Category.

1. This appeal, at the instance of certain affected landowners, challenges an order dated 21st December 2011 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Delhi (“High Court”, hereafter).

1. The point that arises for our consideration is whether “tinted glass sheets” manufactured by the appellants is liable to be taxed as “goods or wares made of glass” under the Notification No. 5784 dated 07.09.1981 being Entry...

1. The issue that falls for consideration in this case revolves around the true construction, meaning and import of the expression ‘vacant land’ contained in Section 2(q) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (in...

1. The facts of this case raise issues touching upon Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner no. 2 - Anil Saha along with petitioner No. 1 - Sanjit Saha filed a common Special Leave Petition before this Court on...

1. Delay condoned.

1. The petitioner invokes the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the better functioning of the State Information Commissions1 under the Right to Information Act, 2005.2

1. The appellants challenge a decision of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi1 (hereinafter referred to as “NCLAT”) which ruled that as beneficiary of a decree by the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory...