1. Leave granted.

1. This appeal calls into question the correctness of a judgment and order passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh in Criminal Appeal No. 596 of 1992 by which the guilt of the accused and the sentence of imprisonment imposed in...

1. The Petitioner-Bank is aggrieved by an order dated 17th June, 2019 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court in an Intra Court Appeal1 whereby, while taking on record the Joint Memo dated 17th June, 2019 filed by the...

1. Leave granted.

1. “Should the irretrievable breakdown of marriage necessarily result in the dissolution of marriage in exercise of powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India, when such is not a ground for divorce under the Hindu...

1. Delay condoned.

1. The facts of this case raise issues touching upon Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner no. 2 - Anil Saha along with petitioner No. 1 - Sanjit Saha filed a common Special Leave Petition before this Court on...

1. These writ petitions raise questions involving the interpretation of the Office Memoranda [OM] dated 19.01.2019 and 31.01.2019 prescribing the eligibility for the Economically Weaker Section [EWS] Category.

1. Rule Nisi.

1. The petitioner invokes the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the better functioning of the State Information Commissions1 under the Right to Information Act, 2005.2