1. Heard Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, learned counsel appearing for the appellants. Also heard Mr. Rohit Anil Rathi, learned counsel representing respondent no. 1. Mr. Aniruddha A. Joshi, learned counsel appears for respondent nos. 4...

1. Leave granted.

1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant being aggrieved by the judgement and order dated 14th December, 2009, passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur, Bench at Indore in a Writ...

1. This is an appeal preferred by the accused nos. 1 and 2. The learned Trial Court convicted accused no. 3 - Paro Yadav, for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, ‘IPC’).

1. This Court has been called upon to resolve an issue which arose in the context of three statutes - the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 19961, the Indian Stamp Act 18992, and the Indian Contract Act 1872.3 The Stamp Act...

1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw this special leave petition.

1. This judgment will dispose of above-mentioned two appeals as the common question of law and facts are involved.

1. The Principal Sessions Judge, Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil, vide judgment and order dated 22nd March 2002, convicted the appellant for committing murder and sentenced him to life in prison together with fine of Rs. 1000/...

1. The questions to be determined in this lis are:

1. This judgment is enriched by the discussions with my distinguished colleagues - Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice Bhushan R Gavai and Justice Surya Kant - during the course of oral arguments and...