1. The respondent no. 1 is 100 per cent visually impaired. He appeared in the Civil Services Examination, 2008 (CSE-2008). Respondent no. 1 gave four preferences for services in the following order: Indian Administrative Services...

1. Births of crimes and culprits concerned, occur together.

1. These Civil Appeals are filed against the judgment dated 16.10.2019 in R.F.A. No. 3052 of 2010 and Cross-objection No. 103 of 2011, on the file of the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

1. There are approximately [35] state-aided Universities in the State of West Bengal.

1. This criminal appeal, by special leave, calls in question the judgment and order dated 28th September, 2011 of the Kerala High Court1 dismissing the appellant's appeal2 under section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

1. These appeals take exception to the judgment and order dated 7th November 2008 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short, ‘the Tribunal’).

1. Births of crimes and culprits concerned, occur together.

1. Counsel for the parties were heard.

1. Shri Manoj Goel, learned senior counsel for the appellants and Shri Manoj Swarup, learned senior counsel for the respondents were heard.