1. For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:—

1. Leave granted.

1. Since the issues raised in both the captioned appeals are same, the parties are also same and the challenge is also to the self-same judgment and order passed by the High Court, those were taken up for hearing analogously and...

1. Since the issues raised in both the captioned appeals are same, the parties are also same and the challenge is also to the self-same judgment and order passed by the High Court, those were taken up for hearing analogously and...

1. This appeal is at the instance of the original first informant brother of the deceased, seeking to challenge the order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Criminal Application No. 207 of 2013, dated 22nd of...

1. The instant appeals have been preferred by the accused-appellants against the common judgment dated 15.05.2013 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Criminal Appeal No. 1850 of 2010 and other connected matters wherein...

1. The present set of two appeals have been filed by the State of Chhattisgarh challenging the impugned common judgment and order passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur in Criminal Appeal No. 601 of 2007 and...

1. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, Sanjay Kumar, at some length, who has drawn our attention to the depositions of the eye-witnesses, namely, Sanjay Kumar (the appellant and informant/complainant)...

1. Leave granted.

1. Challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 22.07.2015, for the offence under Section 364A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short “IPC”) passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Criminal Appeal (DB) No...