1. The impugned orders in these appeals are more or less identical. Therefore, we are making a reference to the factual aspects in Civil Appeal Nos. 4480-4481 of 2023.

1. Heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent/State.

1. Leave granted.

1. Four accused persons namely, Mohd. Yunus (A1), Mohd. Jamil (A2), Ghasita (A3) and Akhtar Hussain (A4) were sent for trial for the same incident which occurred on 09.01.1999 causing death of Akbar (deceased) and injuries to...

1. Respondents 1 to 3 had filed an objection under section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”, hereafter) in an execution application filed before the Executing Court by the appellants. It was urged, based on the case...

1. The Chittorgarh Fort represents the quintessence of a tribute to nationalism, courage, medieval chivalry, and sacrifice exhibited between the seventh and the sixteenth centuries by several rulers, like the Mewar rulers of...

1. Application for impleadment is allowed. Mr. Nishant Sharma, complainant, shall be added as a respondent to these proceedings. Mr. Rahul Sharma, counsel appears along with Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, counsel on behalf of the newly...

1. We have heard the learned counsel on the question of issuing interim directions for the effective implementation of the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, ‘the MV Act’) relating to the grant of compensation...

1. The first respondent, a former Executive Director of the Central Warehousing Corporation, approached the National Green Tribunal (for short, ‘the NGT’) by filing an original application. The first respondent filed the original...

1. Leave granted.